Category: Acts for a 21st c. Church

Acts Apostolos - Acts of the Apostles - the chronicles of Christ's Apostles - a history of Christ's Church including early leaders like Stephen, Philip the Evangelist, Paul, Barnabas and many others
Acts of the Apostles + a History of Christ’s Church

Acts of the Apostles 1-28

 

Acts of the Apostles:
+ The first century Church SHARED Christ while suffering severe persecution.
+ Luke records a historic account of the Church which gives 21c Christians a context to SHARE the Gospel of Jesus Christ with others.

Read more about the Early Church & add your COMMENT on Scripture.

ACT now.

+ SHARE the Gospel history witnessed in the CURRENT chronological SERIES from ACTS of the APOSTLES.

  • ACTS of the Herods 25

    ACTS of the Herods 25

    The not-so-great HEROD’s – client-kings of the Jews

    “BUT WAIT,” you may be thinking; “we were following ACTS of the APOSTLES and Paul.”

    Note the timeline above with its anti-Christian timeline bias utilizing BCE (Before the Common Era) rather than B.C. (Before Christ). 

    What IF history had recorded the politics of the JEWS and ROMANS in place of the truth of Christ?

    We would have read nothing of Herod’s killing of the innocents (trying to prevent the birth of the Messiah JESUS).

    • OR of Jewish and Roman injustice of the Cross of Jesus – KING OF THE JEWS!
    • OR any account of the leading Pharisee Saul of Tarsus proclaiming Christ risen to all the world as far as Rome.

    NO —  Luke’s detailed account of the Apostles would have been buried in the politics of A.D. 1st century Caesars and certain Kings preordained by the Lord God to fail in their temporal empires and kingdoms —  Herod’s and Caesar’s opposed to JESUS, the very Son of God redeeming a chosen remnant of sinners — sinners from every nation of the world and sinners from every time since the beginning of mortals and the end of our timeline in eternity.

    Acts from Herod the Great to Herod Agrippa II

    family tree of the Herod's from Herod the Great

    In order to understand Roman administration of captive kingdoms or Roman states of the Herod’s, as well as something of the fall of Jerusalem which will soon take place, let’s take a look at the WHO’S-WHO of this client dynasty as we proceed in the Acts of the Apostles.

    the politics of King Agrippa and Festus

    A PLEASING PUBLIC POLITICAL MEETING 

    Now several days later, Agrippa [II] the king and Bernice [his sister] arrived at Caesarea and paid their respects to Festus [the new governor].

    Acts of the Apostles 25:13 AMP

    While they were spending many days there [in the Roman capital of Caesarea] , Festus laid Paul’s case before the king…

    Make no mistake about it — Rome is in control, but in order to rule effectively Roman governors use local political powerhouses to govern public opinion.

    Political Protocol of the Pax Romana

    Luke refers to our main player in Paul’s case as, “King Agrippa,” but to Rome, Julius Marcus (AKA Herod Agrippa II) is simply one of several useful foreign kings.

    .

    Caesarea! a model of Roman incursion into all the world of the Mediterranean - a key port for Romans, a city where Cornelius, Philip, Peter, Paul and others brought the gospel

    He brings with him his sister, oldest daughter of Herod Agrippa I as they formally and publically meet Governor Porcius Festus in Caesarea.


    Luke continues with the political problem of Paul left to the new Prefect Festus:

    saying (to Agrippa) [NKJV],

    “There is a certain man left a prisoner by Felix, about whom the chief priests and the elders of the Jews informed me, when I was in Jerusalem, asking for a judgment against him.

    Note that this new Roman Prefect has already been in Jerusalem without meeting with King Agrippa. 

    To them I answered,

    ‘It is not the custom of the Romans to deliver any man to destruction [ἀπώλεια] before the accused meets the accusers face to face, and has opportunity to answer for himself concerning the charge against him.’

    Certainly this newly appointed Governor of Judea is familiar with the problem of the JUDGMENT of JESUS the King of the JEWS by a previous Governor Pontius Pilate.

    Therefore when they had come together, without any delay, the next day I sat on the judgment seat and commanded the man to be brought in.

    The Roman Governor has already judged the Roman citizen Paulos (in Jerusalem) before this political appeal of King Herod Agrippa II. 

    The Governor continues his account of Paul’s recent trial over which he presided:

    “When the accusers stood up, they brought no accusation against him of such things as I supposed, but had some questions against him about their own religion and about a certain Jesus, who had died, whom Paul affirmed to be alive.

    Now full-well knowing the controversies centered on the Christ of the Jews, Governor Porcius Festus addresses Julius Marcus Agrippa II as a politically impartial third party with interest in the case of the Governor's prisoner. 

    And because I was uncertain of such questions, I asked whether he was willing to go to Jerusalem and there be judged concerning these matters. But when Paul appealed to be reserved for the decision of Augustus [the title of the Roman emperors], I commanded him to be kept till I could send him to Caesar.”

    Roman Coin with profile of Nero Caesar Augustus

    Nero Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus, no friend of followers of The Way, had appointed Portus Festus as Governor of Judea.

    Herod Agrippa’s play for power

    Then Agrippa said to Festus,

    “I also would like to hear the man myself.”

    “Tomorrow, you shall hear him.”


    So the next day, when Agrippa and Bernice had come with great pomp, and had entered the auditorium with the commanders and the prominent men of the city [Caesarea], at Festus’ command Paul was brought in.

    And Paul said, “I would to God that not only you, but also all who hear me today, might become both almost and altogether such as I am, except for these chains.” - Paul addressing Festus, Herod Agrippa II and Bernice - Acts 26:29
    REMEMBER: 
    ROME's Governor is in charge. The Prefect of Judea repeats what he has already told King Herod Agrippa II.

    And Festus said:

    “King Agrippa and all the men who are here present with us,

    you see this man about whom the whole assembly of the Jews petitioned me, both at Jerusalem and here, crying out that he was not fit to live any longer.

    But when I found that he had committed nothing deserving of death, and that he himself had appealed to Augustus, I decided to send him.

    The Governor is confirming Paul's legal disposition as well as his own fair hand in his decision of the Court.

    “I have nothing certain to write to my lord concerning him.

    Festus, wanting to present some facts to his lord Caesar in Rome, invites these Jewish leaders and accusers of Paul to give him the facts. 

    The Governor would not have had to send any facts to Nero, but out of Festus' astute political savvy he has an audience of all who could object to his decision.

    Therefore I have brought him out before you, and especially before you, King Agrippa, so that after the examination has taken place I may have something to write. For it seems to me unreasonable to send a prisoner and not to specify the charges against him.”


    Brilliant! Let the local king provide their case to Caesar (who could only blame Felix or the Jews AND NOT him).

    Then Agrippa said to Paul, “You are permitted to speak for yourself.”

    So Paul stretched out his hand and answered for himself:

    Acts of the Apostles 26:1 NKJV

    Once again, the Governor sets the tone of his meeting of all who had accused Paul.

    Festus begins by allowing the defense of this Roman citizen already found innocent to proceed BEFORE hearing ANY Jewish charges.

    Furthermore, Governor Festus invites Paul to speak directly to him and to Herod Agrippa II (client king of the Jews) FIRST.

    “I think myself happy, King Agrippa, that I am to make my defense before you this day concerning all the things whereof I am accused by the Yehudim…

    Acts of the Apostles 26:2 – Hebrew Names Version


    The ACTS of the Apostle Paul (in court again) — To be continued…

    Talk of JESUS . com

    Comment on Scripture – Share the Gospel

  • Two more years and another administration – Porcius Festus

    Two more years and another administration – Porcius Festus

    Politics of Leadership (Don’t cha luv it?)

    Administration of a land conquered by the Caesars to whom you have sworn allegiance is not such an easy job (although it pays well).

    Governor Antonius Felix, Roman procurator of Judaea, Samaria, Galilee, and Perea had essentially dodged a political bullet when he left Paul in prison for two years.

    Luke tells us the Felix had been hoping for a bribe.

    But when two years had elapsed, Felix was succeeded by Porcius Festus; and desiring to do the Jews a favor, Felix left Paul in prison.

    Acts of the Apostles 24:27 RSV

    Did the Jewish leaders perhaps bribe their Roman procurator to keep Paul in prison?

    Hard to tell, but we do know that after two years a change in administration brings a new Roman governor to act as judge in Paul’s long-continued case.


    ~A.D. 60 – Quick Justice at last

    Let's clear the old administrative docket.

    Acts 25:

    Jerusalem, first stop in administration of Judea.

    Now when Festus had come into his province, after three days he went up to Jerusalem from Caesarea. And the chief priests and the principal men of the Jews informed him against Paul; and they urged him, asking as a favor to have the man sent to Jerusalem…

    Sound familiar from their previous deceitful acts before Felix tried to sort it all out? 

    Luke continues his narrative:

    … planning an ambush to kill him on the way.

    Giving a strong administrative response showing the Jews that he, the Roman governor is in charge:

    Festus replied that Paul was being kept at Caesarea, and that he himself intended to go there shortly.

    Acts 25:4 RSV

    Now the Roman administrator of Judea asserts his office as judge of all cases before the same corrupt officials of the Sanhedrin secretly seeking to assassinate Paul (the Roman citizen, by the way).

    “So,” said he, “let the men of authority among you go down with me, and if there is anything wrong about the man, let them accuse him.”

    Acts 25:5 RSV – orders of the Roman Proconsul Festus to the Jews

    When he had stayed among them not more than eight or ten days, he went down to Caesarea; and the next day he took his seat on the tribunal and ordered Paul to be brought.

    judge gavel

    And when he [Paul] had come, the Jews who had gone down from Jerusalem stood about him, bringing against him many serious charges which they could not prove.

    Paul pleads INNOCENT

    “Neither against the law of the Jews, nor against the temple, nor against Caesar have I offended at all.”

    Now obviously after just a week in Jerusalem; like Felix, Festus has learned the ropes of governing the Jews. 

    Festus offers a political compromise:

    “Do you wish to go up to Jerusalem, and there be tried on these charges before me?”

    Paul’s political savvy:

    “I am standing before Caesar’s tribunal, where I ought to be tried;

    The Apostle has already pled his innocence in his opening statement. 

    .. to the Jews I have done no wrong, as you know very well.

    Acts 25:10 – response of Paul the Roman citizen to Festus the Roman Governor

    The Apostle continues his brief defense in this administrative arraignment hearing before Festus: 

    If then I am a wrongdoer, and have committed anything for which I deserve to die, I do not seek to escape death;

    but if there is nothing in their charges against me, no one can give me up to them.

    I appeal to Caesar.”


    Does Paul trust local Roman administrators such as Felix and Festus anymore than he trusts the leaders of the Jews who have been trying to assinate the Apostle out of the sight of Jerusalem’s Temple?

    Besides, the Lord has revealed to Paul that He will send him to Rome!

    The following night the Lord stood by him and said,

    “Take courage, for as you have testified about me at Jerusalem, so you must bear witness also at Rome.”

    Acts of the Apostles 23:11 RSV


    Ex proprio motu

    Commonly spoken as “by one’s own accord.”

    Then Festus, when he had conferred with his council, answered,

    “You have appealed to Caesar;

    to Caesar you shall go.”

    Acts 25:12 RSV

    So be it.

    As far as Roman justice is concerned (here in Judea under the administration of Portus Festus) that’s it. The Governor must send Paul’s case to Caesar.

    NEXT – Paul encounters the politics of King Agrippa and Festus

  • Most Excellent Felix – Tertullus for the Prosecution

    Most Excellent Felix – Tertullus for the Prosecution

    Today we find ourselves with Paul in Caesarea facing Felix.

    (The plot thickens even after a secretive conspiracy to assassinate the Apostle.)

    History plays out over time through the interactions of its leading actors. Luke records the Acts of these men of the A.D. first century whose leading actors include:

    • the Apostle Paul,
    • Claudius Lysias (via his letter),
    • Felix,
    • Festus,
    • Agrippa and a host of minor actors in the plot of the Jews to execute Jesus’ Apostle
    • and of course, Roman generals – pawns of the Emperors and Caesars.
    Luke focuses on each of these in Acts, which we have cataloged into chapters 22-26. 

    He does not need to set the stage for his first century readers, but you may benefit from a few details.

    ~ A.D. 58

    This courtroom scene (so to speak) now takes place in the Roman stronghold of Caesarea before the Roman Governor Felix, rather than in a biased Jewish court from where the Apostle and Roman citizen Paulos had been whisked away.

    The Political Place of Antonius Felix

    Antonius Felix (b. ~ A.D. 5-10)

    Appointed Governor of Judea in ~AD 53, the Emperor Claudius had responded to a petition of his Secretary of the Treasury Marcus to elect his own younger brother Felix as Judea’s new Procurator.

    Although his name Felix means ‘happy,’ sources agree that in his rule of Judea:

    He ruled the province in a mean, cruel, and profligate manner. His period of office was full of troubles and seditions.

    Strong’s G5344 – phēlix – BlueLetterBible.org

    And for the politically unastute, a brief definition of sedition:

    "The raising of commotion in a state, not amounting to insurrection; conduct tending to treason, but without an overt act; excitement of discontent against the government, or of resistance to lawful authority."
    - source: Wordnik

    Just in case you missed the dramatic events leading up to this change of venue, READ all about it below for a better understanding of the Jewish prosecutors about to appear before Felix. 

    Paul’s Trial before Felix in Caesarea

    Acts of the Apostles 24:

    Scriptural quotes primarilary from the ASV 

    And after five days the high priest Ananias came down with certain elders, and with an orator, one Tertullus; and they informed the governor against Paul. And when he was called, Tertullus began to accuse him..


    Now the high priest of the Jews has no standing in a judicial court of the Roman government of Judea. However the lead prosecutor of Jerusalem’s religious council has hired a well-known orator to prosecute their case in Caesarea.

    Tertullus, which means “triple-hardened,” was a Roman orator in the tradition of Cicero and several of the Caesars known for public speeches designed to sway large crowds of fellow Romans to their way of thinking.


    Seeing that by thee we enjoy much peace,

    and that by thy providence evils are corrected for this nation,

    we accept it in all ways and in all places, most excellent Felix, with all thankfulness.

    But, that I be not further tedious unto thee, I entreat thee to hear us of thy clemency a few words. But, that I be not further tedious unto thee, I entreat thee to hear us of thy clemency a few words.


    Always beware.. when a politician claims to have 'a few words.' 

    For we have found this man a pestilent fellow, and a mover of insurrections among all the Jews throughout the world, and a ringleader of the sect of the Nazarenes:

    (that is, followers of Jesus of Nazareth) 

    who moreover assayed to profane the temple: on whom also we laid hold: and we would have judged him according to our law.


    Tertullus, the prosecuting Roman orator hired by the Jews, then turns to make charges against the Roman military athority who snatched Paul (the defendant) from their jurisdiction of Jerusalem’s local authorities and justice of the Sanhedrin.

    Lysius, commanding his

    (that is Paul's or the defendant's) 

    accusers to come before thee. from whom thou wilt be able, by examining him thyself, to take knowledge of all these things whereof we accuse him.


    (In other words, you will find him guilty of our charges.)

    And, as in so many venues where Paul had been called to defend his actions for the gospel of Jesus Christ — practically on cue, the men of the council accompanying the high priest Ananias, ‘joined in the charge, affirming that these things were so.’

    judge gavel

    The Court will hear from the Defendant

    Paul:

    Forasmuch as I know that thou hast been of many years a judge unto this nation, I cheerfully make my defence: seeing that thou canst take knowledge that it is not more than twelve days since I went up to worship at Jerusalem:

    and neither in the temple did they find me disputing with any man or stirring up a crowd, nor in the synagogues, nor in the city.

    Neither can they prove to thee the things whereof they now accuse me.

    The opening arguments have concluded.


    Paul’s Defense of the Gospel

    Rome, of course, has NO interest in the Gospel; although politicians and orators may claim the Good News when politically expediant.

    Everyone in the courtroom of Felix would have known that some twenty years ago the Emperor Caligula had declared himself a god. And his successor Claudius (to whom Felix was connected) had recently conquered Britain and seemed to have little interest in affairs to the east, here in remote Judea.

    But as Paul, Tertullus, Ananias and the elders all knew, Caesar was no friend of the Jews, since Claudius had deported them from Rome just nine years ago. And they gained no favor with the current Emperor Nero either.

    So Paul continues his defense:


    But this I confess unto thee, that after the Way which they call a sect, so serve I the God of our fathers,

    believing all things which are according to the law, and which are written in the prophets;

    having hope toward God, which these also themselves look for,

    that there shall be a resurrection both of the just and unjust.

    Acts of the Apostles 24:14-15 ASV

    Of course as always, the resurrection brings into play the great controversy of GOD exercising both reward and punishment to every soul after the death of our mortal flesh. 

    AND at the center of the controversy of this GOSPEL proclamation of the Apostle stands the MESSIAH JESUS - the risen Christ of the Jews crucified on a Roman Cross under Pontius Pilate in Jerusalem some two-dozen years before.

    Paul tells the court the reason for his return to Jerusalem.

    Now after some years I came to bring alms to my nation, and offerings: amidst which they found me purified in the temple, with no crowd, nor yet with tumult..

    Remember? There had been a famine. And Paul had been asking all the churches in his missionary jouneys for help for the poor (alms) in Jerusalem. 
    drawing of Herod's Temple

    Herod’s temple in Jerusalem effectually becomes a large, highly regulated public square during festivals. It is unlike a church building or large meeting house.

    Paul defends his public worship there and the lack of evidence that he caused any trouble:

    but there were who ought to have been here before thee [Felix, that is], and to make accusation, if they had aught against me.

    Acts 24:19 ASV

    Obviously, these so-called-witnesses were NOT called to the stand to accuse Paulos in person. 

    Furthermore, Paul continues answering such inadmissable hearsay by challenging those Elders present.
    Was it something I said?

    “Or else let those who are here [Ananias and the Elders of Jerusalem’s council] themselves say if they found any wrongdoing in me [or what wrongdoing] while I stood before the council, unless it is for this one statement which I cried out, standing among them, ‘Concerning the resurrection of the dead I am being judged by you this day.’ ”

    Acts 24:20-21 NKJV

    judge gavel

    The Court will be in recess

    Luke’s transcript of the court proceedings ends and he adds additional background of context for the reader.

    But Felix, having more exact knowledge concerning the Way, deferred them, saying,

    ‘When Lysias the chief captain shall come down, I will determine your matter.’

    The Governor, Felix, is a skillfull politician dealing with Jews, Christians (followers of the Way), financial supporters of Nero and Rome, Centurians of Rome’s powerful occupying military and even the handling of grandious prosecuting oraters selling their case such as Tertullus.

    And he gave order to the centurion that he [Paulos] should be kept in charge [custody], and should have indulgence [provisions]; and not to forbid any of his friends to minister unto him.

    Acts 24:23 ASV


    Political inaction — and the Judgment to come

    What happens next may look familiar to any who follow the cunning of political strategists.

    Since Felix’s obvious action that fairness and justice would demand will create additional trouble in governing, Felix the Governor waits for a more opportune time for public support — and for filling the coffers of his personal PAC which he might use later to gain higher office.

    (Felix is looking for a handout $$.)

    Luke continues by accounting for Felix’s delay in justice:

    But after certain days, Felix came with Drusilla, his wife, who was a Jewess, and sent for Paul, and heard him concerning the faith in Christ Jesus.

    Acts 24:24 ASV

    Drusilla was the youngest daughter of Herod Agrippa I and the sister of Herod Agrippa II, making her a member of the Herodian dynasty, which played a significant role in the political and religious landscape of Judea during the first century. 
    - source BibleHub.com

    And as he [her husband the Governor] reasoned of righteousness, and self-control, and the judgment to come, Felix was terrified..

    The Apostle had noted the appropriate fear of Felix for judgment of his own guilty soul.

    Luke adds Felix’s sudden dismissal of Paul saying:

    .. ‘Go thy way for this time; and when I have a convenient season, I will call thee unto me.’

    Days pass… and more time passes.

    Luke notes what everyone knew: it took a bribe to garner a favorable outcome from the Governor:

    He hoped withal that money would be given him of Paul: wherefore also he sent for him the oftener, and communed with him.

    But while Paul remained in ‘protective custody’ of the Governor of Judea in Caesarea, time not only passed but grows short for Felix.

    He was succeeded by Porcius Festus, and when recalled to Rome, he escaped being sentenced to death by Nero only through the intercession of his brother, Pallas. His oppressive rule caused deep resentment among the Jews and strengthened the anti-Roman party.

    source: Encyclopedia.com

    Again.. time passes, Luke records:

    But when two years were fulfilled, Felix was succeeded by Porcius Festus; and desiring to gain favor with the Jews, Felix left Paul in bonds.

    Acts of the Apostles 24:27 ASV

    To be continued — in the NEXT administration…

    Talk of JESUS . com

    Comment on Scripture – Share the Gospel