Tag: pharisees

  • James and Jerusalem’s Controversy – 7

    James and Jerusalem’s Controversy – 7

    Jerusalem’s controversy at the time of Jesus and James continues to this day, yet goes back to the centuries before Christ.

    “ירושלים, ירושלים, ההורגת את הנביאים ורוגמת באבנים את שליחי אלוהים, פעמים רבות חפצתי לקבץ את בניך כתרנגולת המקבצת את אפרוחיה תחת כנפיה, אולם לא הנחתם לי.

    הבשורה על-פי לוקס 13:34 Habrit Hakhadasha/Haderekh (HHH)

    I briefly outlined a few controversies from the history of Jerusalem in an earlier post, which also includes a helpful timeline. More recently we have examined the setting of the first century church in Jerusalem during its leadership by James.

    And in the preceding post we discussed the probable relationship between the two brothers James and Jesus, before the Lord’s resurrection.

    Jerusalem’s Controversy

    Most of us know very little of the ancient history which preceded Rome’s dominance of Judea.

    Jesus, the Apostles, James and first century residents of Jerusalem would have looked at Jerusalem’s controversy through contemporary eyes. Their perspective is very distant to our own understanding.

    The glory of Israel under King David and Solomon from their Bible teachings were distant memories ten centuries past. Even the Second Temple dated five hundred years before the Judea of Jesus and James.

    Alexander captured Jerusalem in 332 BC

    Although Jerusalem was finally spared by powerful empires from the east, those same empires would fall to Alexander the Great of Macedon about three centuries before Christ.

    Alexander captured the captors of Jerusalem, Egypt, Babylon and Assyria. Consequently, Hellenism and the Greek language assimilated easily into the surrounding cultures of the whole world known to Jerusalem.

    This universal acceptance continued to impact all of the Mediterranean even after Rome’s dominance. Alexandria, which he founded in Egypt, would later become a strategic political center tied to the fates of Rome.

    Just a few generations Before Christ

    coin head of Antiochus IV Epiphanes

    (a few generations after Alexander)

    175-163 B.C. The reign of Antiochus IV Epiphanes

    The Seleucid king of the Hellenistic Syrian kingdom who called himself, “god manifest,” caused a revolt in Jerusalem. This overt blasphemy by a ruling emperor forced deep divisions between religious rulers and political thought among local leaders.

    Jews would have taken a stance during the sieges of Tyre and Gaza, ports crucial to trade and the well-being of Jerusalem. The complexity of the political intrigue also involves Rome, Egypt and others, but for Jerusalem the rise of Antiochus IV caused the revolt of the Maccabees.

    Pharisees, Sadducees, Essenes & others

    What do we remember of our history?

    • Moses, first. The Lord led Israel from captivity in Egypt, the the LORD give the Law (Torah) to us through Moses. c. 1525 BC
    • David unites the twelve tribes into one, capturing the promised land.
    • Solomon built the richest and most powerful kingdom and also the Temple. c. 966 BC
    • Israel and Judah separate and both eventually fall to others.
    • Judaism continues in Babylon and prophets predict many things.
    • The Torah was lost and forgotten, but then found during the rebuilding of the second Temple c. 570 BC
    • Several ruling empires tolerated Judaism while ruling over Jerusalem.
    • Antiochus does not, declaring himself ‘God in the flesh’ in the Temple.

    Does this controversy resonate in the conversations of first century Jews? Of course it does.

    “Is Jesus the Messiah,” many would ask?

    Is this man Jesus of Nazareth, brother of James and Joses, actually God Incarnate?”

    Therefore, from this more recent background of Jerusalem’s controversy, James, now leader of the church in Jerusalem, must address the Good News that Jesus IS the promised Messiah.

    Although not unlike today’s controversies, first century believers knew that the expected answer of a questioner could depend upon the party of their religious affiliation. Their questions came from diverse political and religious views.

    167 BC – What to do?

    So what must you do, believer in the Lord God?

    At the time of Antiochus several opposing religious and political movements took root.

    During the formation of the Jewish religious parties and political movements prior to the days of Jesus Christ and Herod, all debated what followers of the Lord must do in each circumstance at various times.

    The question to Jesus or to James in the first century AD remains nearly the same as now in the 21st c. A.D.

    Scribes & Zealots

    One group with both political and religious influence chose to separate religion from politics, claiming the higher ground of religion. The Scribes reached back to the authority of the re-established Law under Ezra the founding priest of the second Temple.

    Zealots took a radically different approach to the invaders taking from them the promised land of God. At various times bands of Zealots hid in the mountains, formed powerful armed communities and used terrorism to attack the invaders from their mountain strongholds. (Does this radical religious military tactic sound at all familiar?)

    כִּֽי־קִנְאַ֣ת בֵּיתְךָ֣ אֲכָלָ֑תְנִי וְחֶרְפֹּ֥ות חֹ֝ורְפֶ֗יךָ נָפְל֥וּ עָלָֽי׃
    because zeal for your house has consumed me,
    and the insults of those who insult you have fallen on me.

    Psalm 69:9 WLC;CSB

    Additional research on Jerusalem’s controversy at this time appears below, along with a brief outline of other Jewish political/religious parties of the first century AD.

    Judah Maccabee – Savior of Judaism

    Excerpts Source: ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA

    On Antiochus’ death in 164 BCE, the Seleucids offered the Jews freedom of worship, but Judas continued the war, hoping to free his nation politically as well as religiously.

    The son of Mattathias, an aged priest who took to the mountains in rebellion when Antiochus attempted to impose the Greek religion on the Jews, Judas took over the rebel leadership on his father’s death and proved to be a military genius, overthrowing four Seleucid armies in quick succession and restoring the Temple of Jerusalem.

    This deed is celebrated in the Jewish festival of lights, Ḥanukka.

    The Hasmonean Kings of Judah

    The Maccabees founded the Hasmonean dynasty, which began their rule in 167 BC. They eventually managed independence for their kingdom of Judah from 110 BC until 63 BC.

    The decline of the Hasmoneans coincided with the rise of Rome, but it wasn’t coincidence, for the once great Jewish family had become a shell of its holy roots.

    End of the Hasmoneans

    In the year 67 BCE, Queen Salome Alexendra (also known as Queen Shelomtzion) died. With her death, the dynasty of the Hasmoneans began a steady decline. Over the next 20-25 years it would fall apart completely. – source

    Jerusalem’s Controversy after the Hasmoneans

    Although divisions in rabbinic thought existed from earlier times, the onslaught of Roman power into the eastern Mediterranean brought about deeper divides in political and religious alliances.

    A timeline of Jerusalem’s conflict after the end of the Hasmoneans details additional events.

    Ideally, he [Pompey the Great, of Rome] did not want to do it through war, because the Jews – the Hasmoneans/Maccabees – had a fearsome reputation. The Romans referred to the Jews as “porcupines.” Just as a porcupine is an animal that even great predators avoid, so too the Jews. Even if you ate it you would be sorry. Therefore, Pompey wanted to control the Jews without somehow going to war. Source.

    Herods – Kings of Compromise

    NOTE: When you see the name Herod in the Bible, always ask yourself, which one?
    image of Herod the Great
    Herod the Great

    An article in Christianity Today sheds light on a view likely held by the rich and powerful Jewish leaders in the first century AD.

    In terms of wealth, power, and influence, Herod the Great rivaled King Solomon as the greatest king in the history of the Jews.

    Christianity Today – Dec 22, 2015 – Alexander Stewart

    Herod was born in the Roman region of Idumea (formerly Edom) around 74 BC, built the Roman port of Caesarea and expanded the second Temple in Jerusalem. Christians know Herod for his attempt to prevent an innocent baby born in Bethlehem from becoming King.

    When Pompey’s ally Herod died, not only did Joseph and Mary return with Jesus to Nazareth in Israel, but politically Rome divided his kingdom between Herod’s three sons and daughter. Again, the politics and various names of the Herod’s is complex, but first century Jews became caught up in it all.

    Competing Religious Parties – Jerusalem’s controversy of the Temple

    Party of the Sadducees – 167 BC

    The Sadducees are a Jewish group mentioned in three different contexts in the Synoptic Gospels ( Mark 12:18 ; [= Matt 22:23-34 ; Luke 20:27] ; Matt 3:7 ; 16:1-12 ) and six in Acts ( 4:1 ; 5:17 ; 23:6-8 ). They always appear as inquisitors or opponents of John the Baptist, Jesus, or the early Christians. – Baker’s Evangelical Dictionary

    Rabbinic writings sometimes interchange the term “Sadducee” with “Samaritans” (here meaning “opponents”) and “Boethuians.” The latter is probably from their connection with the house of Boethus, from which came several high priests during the New Testament period.

    Party of the Essenes – 167 BC

    John the Baptist most likely was of one of the Essenes.

    When Jerusalem’s controversy erupted in the second century BC, the Essenes withdrew into the Judean desert and formed an isolated monistic community dedicated to the word of God and obedience to the Lord.

    Unlike the Zealots, the Essenes had no agenda to retake the land of the promised land ‘for God.’

    History recalled little about the Essenes until shepherds recovered the buried Dead Sea scrolls in Qumran Lebanon in A.D. 1948. The slow and meticulous study of these scroll fragments has revealed more in this past century.

    Qumran, between the Judean hills and the Dead Sea. Qumran,

    Party of the Pharisees – 167 BC

    Jerusalem’s controversy most familiar to Christians is that of the resurrection. Not all Jews believed in the resurrection of the body and soul, but the Pharisees did.

    However the party of the Pharisees had already divided into many opinionated sects over the written Law, the oral law, additional regulations and many other controversies. Discussion of these among rabbis reached far beyond Jerusalem into Galilee and other regions.

    Φαρισαῖος – Pharisaios

    In addition to OT books the Pharisees recognised in oral tradition a standard of belief and life. They sought for distinction and praise by outward observance of external rites and by outward forms of piety, and such as ceremonial washings, fastings, prayers, and alms giving; and, comparatively negligent of genuine piety, they prided themselves on their fancied good works. They held strenuously to a belief in the existence of good and evil angels, and to the expectation of a Messiah; and they cherished the hope that the dead, after a preliminary experience either of reward or of penalty in Hades, would be recalled to life by him, and be requited each according to his individual deeds.

    Strong’s G5330 – blueletterbible.org

    Pharisees were not of the class of the rich, but lived a modest life closer to that of many other Jews. These rabbis were likely affectionate, popular teachers similar to most rabbis today.

    They believed that God would act justly based on their works and attitudes toward others. The Law of Moses and oral law designating how we should obey the Lord provided the basis of their teaching and unity of purpose for a life lived separately from evil.

    First Century Pharisees – in Jerusalem’s controversy of leadership

    John the Baptist called them a brood of vipers (poisonous snakes).

    Matthew tells us that ‘the Pharisees went out and plotted against him [Jesus], how they might kill him.’

    Jesus accepted invitations from Pharisees to publicly join them in their homes. However the Lord also rebuked them, frequently including them with their rival party the scribes.

    “Woe to you Pharisees! You love the front seat in the synagogues and greetings in the marketplaces.

    So the chief priests and the Pharisees convened the Sanhedrin and were saying, “What are we going to do since this man is doing many signs?

    John 11:47

    The Apostle John speaks to the delicacy of their political dilemma within the religious leadership of Jerusalem.

    Nevertheless, many did believe in him even among the rulers, but because of the Pharisees they did not confess him, so that they would not be banned from the synagogue.

    John 12:42

    James, Secretive believer in Jesus?

    I have never heard anyone ask if James believed in Jesus before our Lord’s personal appearance to his half-brother after the resurrection.

    As Peter had denied knowing Jesus at His trial, as the Apostles had gone into hiding and even as many Pharisees and others felt obligated to keep their faith in Jesus secret out of fear for their own lives, James may have come to believe in Jesus.

    James, leader of the church in Jerusalem was about to take on a new role, an important sacrificial leadership of a post-Pentecost church. He would lead and write letters to other fearful new Christians from Jerusalem.

    As Jesus had become Jerusalem’s controversy for the Jews, the Herods and the Romans, so too James was about to become just one more controversial leader in Jerusalem in the first century.

    God-willing, we will return to James’ Letter to the Church next.

    To be continued...

  • Your Mistake – You don’t know the Scriptures – 2

    Jesus replied, “Your mistake is that you don’t know the Scriptures, and you don’t know the power of God.

    Matthew 22:29 NLT

    Pharisees 

    We began this series with the priest of the second Temple Ezra, Looking Back at times preceding the fall of Jerusalem and the first Temple. Continuing with contrasts of Looking Back in real time from our 21st century, we examined a recent history of the Sadducees, whose auspicious beginnings were relatively new in the time of Jesus.

    The question of the preceding centuries before Christ addressed who is in charge in a captive Israel, rather than that those in charge must first serve God.

    We learned that the Sadducees had only been around since only about 175 years at the time of Christ’s teachings. In fact, the Essenes, like John the Baptist, and also the Pharisees could only trace their roots back to this same time.

    Again, think of it in terms of today as looking back to the time of the American Civil War between the divided 33 states of the U.S. Yet the larger question to all generations is: should we look to our leaders for morality?

    Jesus said to them, “Watch and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees.” – Matthew 16:6

    Sadducees had it wrong, because they did not believe the evidence of the resurrection. They filtered scriptural knowledge of others by their own strict literal Hebrew translation, which may or may not have been accurate. The other two parties of Jewish belief were the Pharisees and the Essenes.

    Pharisees and the Essenes

    John the Baptist had withdrawn from the towns ruled by Romans and the religious controversies of power. He believed as the Essenes in a continuing spiritual life after death if we forsake our worldly ways in this mortal life.

    Matthew 3:

    In those days John the Baptist came preaching in the wilderness of Judea, “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.” …

    5 Then Jerusalem and all Judea and all the region about the Jordan were going out to him, 6 and they were baptized by him in the river Jordan, confessing their sins.

    7 But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees coming to his baptism, he said to them, “You brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the wrath to come? 8 Bear fruit in keeping with repentance.

    Even though the Pharisees believed in the resurrection, they also believed more in intellectual wisdom than in following the foolishness of the Lord. The Essenes on the other hand were seeking the Messiah of Scripture, the promised Teacher of All Righteousness. This is why John sent his disciples to Jesus and asked, “Are You the Coming One, or do we look for another?” – Matthew 11:3b – NKJV

    Artist James Tissot (1836–1902) Blue pencil.svg wikidata:Q381248 Title Français : Les pharisiens et les hérodiens conspirent contre Jésus English: The Pharisees and the Herodians Conspire Against Jesus

    Pharisees would have seen Jesus agreeing with them on the resurrection as a victory.  Yet Jesus cautioned the crowds against their hypocrisy even more than opposing practices of Sadducees, Scribes or other political leaders.

    Pharisees had likely been complicite in the elimination of their popular Essene rival, the prophet John, who Herod beheaded. Now the most popular opposition in Israel (which was, of course, a nation no more) was Jesus of Nazareth. Perhaps this charismatic itinerant rabbi is no more knowledgeable of Scripture than a common carpenter’s son. He cannot have done the miracles to which the multitudes give witness. They should easily be able to convince the crowds against this Jesus.

    Matthew 22:15-22

    Then the Pharisees went and plotted how to entangle him in his words. And they sent their disciples to him, along with the Herodians, saying,

    “Teacher, we know that you are true and teach the way of God truthfully, and you do not care about anyone’s opinion, for you are not swayed by appearances. Tell us, then, what you think. Is it lawful to pay taxes to Caesar, or not?”

    But Jesus, aware of their malice, said, “Why put me to the test, you hypocrites?” 

    Not real complementary of these religious leaders of Jerusalem. Jesus did not speak against Herod with the prior intensity of John the Baptist or against their Roman governors. Now the Lord shows the Pharisees a Roman coin and tells them to pay their taxes and ‘give to Caesar what is Caesar’s.” – v.21a

    Jesus also reminds us: ‘and (give) to God the things that are God’s.” –  v.21b

    Matthew, the gospel writer, Disciple and former tax collector records the reaction of the Pharisees to Jesus’ answer to the question Pharisees had carefully crafted to trip Him up.

    When they heard it, they marveled. And they left him and went away. –Matthew 22:22

    Thriving on Controversy

    Pharisees were common people just like you and me, but ambitious to many faults.

    In many ways Pharisees are no different than the politicians and self-absorbed religious leaders of today. They argued amongst themselves endlessly about subtleties of religion and culture they thought most applied in these changed times. They legislated their own interpretations of the Law of Moses to educate their disciples to obey as equal to written Scripture and the Torah.

    Pharisees interpreted Law written for Priests and worship into laws forced upon all Jews by additional strict rules of interpretation. These oral laws given to fill in the gaps of what the Law does not prescribe required their own scholarly interpretation, as well as obedient application in everyday life by followers of the Pharisees. A few centuries later these new oral traditions would evolve into various versions of modern judaism.

    Jesus challenged the elevation of Pharisees and other religious participants into authority and glory reserved for Almighty God. The Pharisees sought to dethrone Jesus the Nazarene by catching the Lord off guard in His exclusive claims to powers reserved for God. Even the Scribes agreed of His blasphemy. For no man, after all, can forgive sins; but many have witnessed that Jesus spoke these words to those He healed:

    Your sins are forgiven…


    To be continued…

    Your Mistake – You Don’t Know the Power of God

     

     

     

     

     

  • Ordinary Men -2

    Ordinary Men -2

    Acts 4:5-7

    On the next day their rulers and elders and scribes gathered together in Jerusalem, with Annas the high priest and Caiaphas and John and Alexander, and all who were of the high-priestly family. And when they had set them in the midst, they inquired, “By what power or by what name did you do this?”

    Synopsis

    Annas and Caiaphas and John and Alexander sit here esteemed high above ordinary men, even the highest of aristocrats sitting in the Sanhedrin.

    Annas and Caiaphas and John and Alexander sit here esteemed high above ordinary men, even the highest of aristocrats sitting in the Sanhedrin. We have examined an incident of healing a lame man [Acts 3] in the Temple the previous day. We have also examined the high calling of some of the Temple court officials mentioned above. These not-so-ordinary men mentioned here will examine Peter and John, But first let’s take a look at one additional more common official of the Sanhedrin.

    Jewish Stratification (continued from Ordinary Men – part 1)

    The chief sects among the Jews were the Pharisees, the Sadducees and the Essenes, who may be described respectively as the Formalists, the Freethinkers and the Puritans.

    Pharisees

    The fundamental principle all of the of the Pharisees, common to them with all orthodox modern Jews, is that by the side of the written law regarded as a summary of the principles and general laws of the Hebrew people there was on oral law to complete and to explain the written law, given to Moses on Mount Sinai and transmitted by him by word of mouth.

    The Pharisees at an early day secured the popular favor and thereby acquired considerable political influence. This influence was greatly increased by the extension of the Pharisees over the whole land and the majority which they obtained in the Sanhedrin. Their number reached more than six thousand under the Herods.

    Josephus compared the Pharisees to the sect of the Stoics. He says that they lived frugally, in no respect giving in to luxury. We are not to suppose that there were not many individuals among them who were upright and pure, for there were such men as Nicodemus, Gamaliel, Joseph of Arimathea and Paul.

    The Defense

    Acts 4:6-12

    Then Peter, filled with the Holy Spirit, said to them, “Rulers of the people and elders, if we are being examined today concerning a good deed done to a crippled man, by what means this man has been healed,  let it be known to all of you and to all the people of Israel that by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom you crucified, whom God raised from the dead—by him this man is standing before you well. This Jesus is the stone that was rejected by you, the builders, which has become the cornerstone. And there is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.”

    How should the high court respond?

    You might think by their defense in naming Jesus that Peter is claiming personal innocence in the manor of the man’s healing. After all, why were they arrested; what is their crime? No charge of the supreme court of the Temple (Sanhedrin) was made against them for preaching in the courtyard at church. “By what power or by what name did you do this?”  (referring to the miraculous healing witnessed by many) was their only question to Peter.

    No charges here and the evidence to be presented witnesses a miracle. These Levitical Priests, aristocratic scribes and sadducees, and politically powerful Pharisees sit in judgment of a miracle. ‘How did the Lord use men like these and not a Priest or Temple official to do this?’ they must have thought. The witness of their preaching the previous day had quoted scripture referring to the prophets, the Messiah, Moses, Samuel and Abraham. What could the court say of this a day after the miracle in the courtyard of the Temple?

    [ctt title=”But many of those who had heard the word believed, and the number of the men came to about five thousand. – Acts 4:4″ tweet=”Arrested because the Lord performed a miracle and their preaching is true.” coverup=”cTU1O”]

    Who can preach like this?

    Acts 4:13

    Now when they saw the boldness of Peter and John, and perceived that they were uneducated, common men, they were astonished. And they recognized that they had been with Jesus.

    14 But seeing the man who was healed standing beside them, they had nothing to say in opposition. 15 But when they had commanded them to leave the council, they conferred with one another, 16 saying, “What shall we do with these men? For that a notable sign has been performed through them is evident to all the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and we cannot deny it…

    21 And when they had further threatened them, they let them go, finding no way to punish them, because of the people, for all were praising God for what had happened.

    Witness, Our Only Choice

    [ctt title=”“I have no silver and gold, but what I do have I give to you. In the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, rise up and walk!”” tweet=”Acts 3:6 Peter’s witness before one of many arrests.” coverup=”V5egz”]

    But Peter and John answered them, “Whether it is right in the sight of God to listen to you rather than to God, you must judge, for we cannot but speak of what we have seen and heard.” Acts 4:19-20

    29 And now, Lord, look upon their threats and grant to your servants to continue to speak your word with all boldness, 30 while you stretch out your hand to heal, and signs and wonders are performed through the name of your holy servant Jesus.”

    31 And when they had prayed, the place in which they were gathered together was shaken, and they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and continued to speak the word of God with boldness.