Looking for a ‘church?’ Trying to figure out what your own ‘church’ preaches and teaches?
Here we examine both the historical church and what it means to be called a “Christian,” as well as some virtual misleading by some who claim to be christian and call their building or following ‘church.’
What makes a church Christian? Can we tell from it’s SIGN on the DOOR or internet invitation? Does a traditional denomination make a church Christian? OR does its NAME etched in its brand guarantee preaching of Biblical Christianity?
Defining & Refining CHURCHLabels
As we observed last time concerning labels like ‘evangelical Christians,’ labels don’t generally describe individuals accurately. So too, the names of local churches may appear to be faded remnants of the past or clouded virtual pictures.
Last time I asked a personal question about evangelicals.
Today, however, we will address the body of believers who evangelize the Lord Jesus Christ, those we corporately we call ‘THE CHURCH.”
Church
So how is a godly Christian to know if OUR church preaches the Lord Jesus Christ according to Biblical Christian teaching of two millennia since the resurrection of Christ Jesus?
We have no idea what communicable doctrines a local church may preach, teach and spread into our local and distant communities.
Who are those Christians in that building?
I've even wondered this myself about our local gathering of christians and others in weekly worship, social gatherings (formerly called fellowship {archaic}) and sermon discussion classes (formerly labeled Sunday school {also archaic}) or Bible study {an inappropriate label for any group in a church willing to grow our church vision of Evangelicalism}.
Who are those christians in our church this week:
Members?
Attenders?
Seekers?
Unbelievers
How many of them are there?
Did they applaud the music?
What do they do when it’s not Sunday?
Will they bring someone else next week? (After all, that’s what evangelical christians are supposed to do.)
And what was it that preacher said? …
Let’s sort out a few common terms before proceeding further.
Definitions are my own. Accompanying questions are my personal musings about these same 'religious' terms.
Dictionary definitions (sometimes linked to source) typically include various shades of grey [gray] as is so popular in a world of tolerance accepting many truths - truths which cannot all be true. As you may or may not realize:
DICTIONARIES provide varying definitions of 'religious' terms which often illustrate editor bias against the LORD GOD and JESUS CHRIST.
CATHOLIC, Orthodox & Protestant
Catholic – In a word, Universal or Everybody, but generally used exclusively to mean ROMAN Catholic Church under universal authority of the Bishop of Rome (THE Pope).
Orthodox – Generally viewed as VERY culturally TRADITIONAL worshipers in various Eastern regions, i.e. Russian, Greek; also Jewish, (even Sunni Muslim!) (more)
Protestant – They protest against:
Catholics (mostly),
authority (generally),
other denominations (frequently) and
the sins of others (especially) who ought to become more like them.
Christianity is the world’s most popular religion – with over 2 billion followers. Christianity is the main religion in Northern America, South America, Europe, and parts of Australasia and Africa. Christianity has recently been seen as a religion that acts as a bastion of peace – though tragically, Christians are officially the most persecuted people worldwide.
Does this help?
Do you have your own take on Catholicism, Orthodoxy or Protestantism to SHARE in a COMMENT (please)?
Now that we have outlined the BIG divisions of religions, let's get into some of the CHURCH NAMES (denominations, etc.)
Protestants / Divided
Partial List:
Protests of Protestants tend to lead to exponential multiplication of church names ~ (add 'ism' for its religion name)
Lutheranism (You know, followers of that Protesting Catholic who famously nailed 99 PROTESTS demanding Reformation.) – 16th c. German
Moravianism – 15th c. Bohemian Reformation (before Luther)
Calvinism– 16th c. France – God is King and the Bible’s authority reigns over kings (and church leaders)
Anglicanism – 16th c. England, founded by Henry VIII,
further advanced in 17c. by King James (of Bible fame)
(Episcopalism – US after their 18th century secession from the King of England)
Puritanism – 17th c. Puritans (kicked out of England) desired to further refine the reforms of the Protestant Reformation
Quakerism (Friends) – 17th c. England (Anglican dissenter), George Fox evangelizes in the Colonies
Methodism – 18th c. English missionaries, the Wesley’s, evangelizing colonies in America
Pentecostalism– 20th c. America, incl. Holiness Pentecostals, Assemblies of God & others
Presbyterianism – 18th c. Scotland – Presbyters (select Elders) run the church, not Bishops
Baptists – (‘Baptism‘ better-defined; Many ‘isms’ emerge from the waters of the Baptists.)
Anabaptists – 16th c. Dutch, including Mennonites and Amish
Adventism – 19th c. – Worship on Sabbath (Seventh Day), Jesus is coming soon (i.e. Millerites)
Protestant Denominations
I’ve attempted a BRIEF personal impression of ‘major’ Protestant Denominations (divisions of theological thought). For more information view my source for most: Protestantism and open additional link to Major Branches.
BUT don’t let that SIGN on your Local Church mislead you.
There is much more to Protestant theology (the study of God) than simply knowing what denomination a local church promotes. (That’s why choosing a local church can be so confusing.)
Where do Protestant Denominations draw their lines in the sand?
Evolving Revelations of God?
Several compatible truths?
Limited application of the Bible?
Is the Bible infallible?
What translation is accurate?
Can a preacher paraphrase the Bible?
Does God speak through the words of Scripture or the ideas of Scripture or perhaps both?
How does the Holy Spirit impact worship?
Where does Evangelicalism fit into a contemporary culture of Christianity?
Evangelicalism
It’s NOT a denomination or limited to certain Protestant churches. In fact, Evangelicalism is a movement within Christianity not unlike the charismatic and neo-charismatic movements of the twentieth and earlier centuries. And like any movement – religious, political or cultural in nature, its course continually alters.
I make no claims of expertise on Evangelical Christianity, but defer mostly to one of two sources in what is to follow:
Evangelicalism from multiply-sourced Wikipedia and EVANGELICALISM DIVIDED - A RECORD OF CRUCIAL CHANGE IN THE YEARS 1950 TO 2000, by Iain H. Murray. - RH
Anyone born in the late 20th century or 1950’s as I was will likely picture one preacher as an icon of Evangelism: Billy Graham.
Graham was a Southern Baptist, but listen to his statement to an audience at the principle Roman Catholic University in the United States:
I have no quarrel with the Catholic Church.
Billy Graham, at Notre Dame, 1978
Evangelical Christianity
The secularism of Christianity and the Church is one of the evil tendencies of the day, and is one phase of universalism which the church is now called upon to oppose.. The Papal Church once sought to make Christianity a universal religion by adopting Pagan rites and ceremonies.
Wm G. T. Shedd, The Presbyterian Review, 1886 – source – ix
Evangelicalism is by no means non-controversial. - RH
‘We should be asking: What is a Christian? How can we get forgiveness of sins? and What is a church?’
D. Martyn Lloyd Jones – Evangelical Alliance Conference, 1966- source
Evangelists preach the GOSPEL! Tyndale, of 16th century English Bible fame, called these evangelicals ‘gospellers.’
all the churches of the Reformation were ‘of the gospel’ in their creeds and confessions..
by 18th c. ..there were may pulpits from which no gospel was heard and when the evangel was recovered a term was necessary to distinguish its preachers from others.
It explains much. Even though your CHURCH or Protestant Denomination may claim to orthodox Christian doctrine like the Anglicans and Presbyterians of the 19th century, your local church pastor may not preach the Gospel. Your local preacher may not even be a Christ-believing shepherd and preach from a vision of his own rather than the Good News of the Bible. - RH
Such a divide away from evangelicalism lies in the tempting of certain preachers to veer away from Scripture toward modernist philosophies questioning God’s sovereignty over the free-will of humankind.
Experience, not teaching, has to be the object of the preacher, ‘the real thing in the religious discourse is an imparting of the religious consciousness’.
Evangelism Divided, p.11, citing an author separating biblical revelation from Christian feeling
Belief is NON-essential for christian worship. (Perhaps Jesus will give everyone a saving grace later.)
‘an atheist who lives by love is saved by his faith in the God whose existence (under that name) he denies.’
William Temple, Anglican Archbishop of Canterbury, 1934, – source p.12
How can evangelicalism be said to represent Biblical essentials?
IF one regards as Christians
AND works alongside with
those who actually DENY these essentials [gospel belief]?
How can Christian fellowship exist independently of any common commitment to such belief?
An Evangelical is a person who believes truths essential to salvation and has experienced their power in his own rebirth.
Here is the great divide. The ecumenical people put fellowship before doctrine.
We are evangelicals; we put doctrine before fellowship.
Lloyd-Jones, Evangelical Unity: An Appeal – source pp. 45-46
And they were continually devoting themselves to the apostles’ teaching and to the fellowship, to the breaking of bread and to the prayers.
Acts of the Apostles 2:42 Legacy Standard Bible
Further Division
I believe that there is an intolerance of plain, sober, instructive Christian teaching from the pulpit, which is one of the worst signs of the Christianity of this generation.
Iain Murray, Presbyterian preacher at 2000 member National Evangelical Anglican Congress, Nottingham England - 1977
What if the first need of the Church and the nation was not Christian unity but the recovery of Christianity itself?
In that case the question, ‘What is a Christian?’ demanded a very different order of priority. p.150
When churches loose their influence, when the Christian message ceases to arrest the indifferent and the unbelieving, when moral decline is obvious in places which once owned biblical standards — when such symptoms as these are evident, then the first need is not to regroup such professing Christianity as remains.
It is rather to ask whether the spiritual decline is not due to fundamental failure to understand and practise what Christianity really is.
Iain H. Murray, Evangelism Divided – Retrospect: A Different Approach p. 151
The urgency of our wrong retrospect on what Evangelical Christianity really is seems even more pressing for the 21st century 'evangelical christian' forty years after Murray stated its importance.
Roger@TalkofJESUS.com
Revival of Evangelicalism
Murray continues to make his case for Biblical Evangelical Christianity, a case with which I whole-heartedly agree. – RH
But if the New Testament does settle the question, then we have no liberty to redefine, ‘Christian,’ in terms which neither Christ nor his apostles ever authorized.
Paul writes in his first letter to Timothy of “God our Savior,” who desires all men to be saved and to come to the full knowledge of the truth. –1 Timothy 2:4 LSB
Peter asks new-born Christians (that is, born-again Christians) to ‘long for the pure milk of the word, so that by it you may grow in respect to salvation, if you have TASTED THE KINDNESS OF THE LORD [pointing also to Old Testament Scriptures]. – 1 Peter 2:2b-3
THEN, as Murray points out: This precious value, then, is for you who believe. – 1 Peter 2:7a AND from the Gospel of Luke 14:26 with the Lord Jesus instructing his Apostles in the cost of discipleship: “If anyone comes to Me, and does not [by comparison] hate [family we love]..even his own life, he cannot be My disciple.
Murray continues to make a Scriptural case for Evangelical Christianity.
WHY would any 21st century Evangelical Christian imagine any other way to evangelize the Gospel of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ WITHOUT accurately pointing to the BIBLE?
On the basis of these facts [Scriptures listed by Murray] the New Testament shows that one sure test of a Christian profession is how that person reacts to the Scriptures.
Evangelism Divided – A Record of Crucial Change in the Years 1950-2000 – Iain H. Murray
Evangelizing the Pulpits of ‘Evangelicals‘
I offer here one closing thought to preachers in the pulpits of our 21st century Christian, Protestant Churches who belatedly have a ‘come to JESUS moment’ in considering the many Scriptural examples of evangelicalism.
Orthodox Evangelicalism
Looking for something to preach that will evangelize unbelievers to become members of your local church?
Preach Scripture (as written).
GOD has more credibility than YOU. So if you want to draw more worshipers to Jesus Christ, PREACH JESUS CHRIST from Scripture. It’s our most orthodox method to bring fellow sinners into our church.
IF you read some 21st century definitions of Church, Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox, Evangelical, and OTHER religious terms, you may discover bias of a world listing it as archaic.
Orthodox faith in Jesus Christ from the Bible remains constant even during tides of contemporary ‘christian‘ movements.
Webster’s 1913 Dictionary offers an enduring definition of Orthodox which Pastors may want to consider prayerfully.
Sound in opinion or doctrine, especially in religious doctrine; hence, holding the Christian faith; believing the doctrines taught in the Scriptures; – opposed to heretical and heterodox; as, an orthodox Christian.
According or congruous with the doctrines of Scripture, the creed of a church, the decree of a council, or the like; as, an orthodox opinion, book, etc.
Adhering to generally approved doctrine or practices; conventional. Opposed to unorthodox.
Orthodox Evangelicalism preaches and teaches the Gospel through Scripture.
All Scripture is God-breathed and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness
What makes GOD so offensive to the a-theist who avows opposition to the LORD?
In a WORD: CHRIST +
Atheology – Scientific study of Everythingology
The Religion of A-theism likely has as many branches as Protestantism, which also continues to splinter into several inclusive branches teaching humans Everythingism.
God’s Wrath on Unrighteousness 1:18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth. For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made.
So they are without excuse. 21 For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened.
Claiming to be wise, they became fools, and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things.
24 Therefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies among themselves, because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever! Amen.
Has much changed in twenty-two centuries?
Atheology studies and applies Everythingology to dismantle the exclusive truths of theology.
“This is what the LORD says, He who is the King of Israel and his Redeemer, the LORD of armies:
But FIRST, the a-theist must question Scripture to tear down Trinityand bring down Christ.
The Biblical Premise:
Our God is One, yet is three distinct persons.
“The heart of Christian faith in God,” writes J. I. Packer, “is the revealed mystery of the Trinity. Trinitas is a Latin word meaning threeness. Christianity rests on the doctrine of trinitas, the threeness, the tripersonality, of God.
Ronald Kohl,The Triune God[ix] – quoting “Knowing God” p.65 , J. I. Packer
Trinity and the place of Jesus Christ in worship of the Lord God become the crux of the problem for the a-theist; and also, let the believer beware, ‘christian‘ claimants cloaked in false teaching.
Philosopher Pastors of the School of Everythingology would have us believe that Theology (the study of God) is too complicated for the church. However IF you would READ and believe your BIBLE as written from any reliable translation, then you would see that an informed faith and the study of God are really quite straightforward.
True theology from the teachings of GOD-WITH-US gives disciples of Jesus, the Son of God GOOD NEWS of God’s saving grace proclaimed directly through the Gospels.
Since the days God walked on the earth in the Person of the Son Jesus, CHRIST has been a stumbling stone to the false teachers of everythingology – a-theists willing to teach everything, that is, except Christology.
PLAIN THEOLOGY FOR PLAIN PEOPLE
by Charles Octavius BootheBeloved fellow believer and fellow theologian,
In the following section I outline & quote this study of God extensively. You may find this brief book for the layman [plain people] of the Church as a rich resource on the link above. - Roger@talkofJESUS.com
Evangelicals often presume that the task of theology is merely to comprehend God. God, not context, has ultimate authority, and yet wisdom demands understanding the context in which Christians live and God works.
Walter R Strickland II – Introduction to PLAIN THEOLOGY FOR PLAIN PEOPLE, p. xi
Being and Character of God
“The knowledge of God and of the divine government is sometimes called the science of theology. – p. 4
The heavens declare the glory of God;
And the firmament showeth his handiwork.
Day unto day uttereth speech,
And night unto night showeth knowledge.
(Psalm 19:1-2) [Boothe points to numerous Scriptures in this & every section.] RH
The honest QUESTIONS of Theologyinclude these same topics to which you may not have all the answers. Boothe supports each of these headings by Scripture:
WHERE GOD APPEARS TO US
WHAT MAY BE KNOWN OF HIM
THE UNITY OF GOD
THE TRINITY
I could preach Boothe’s sermon on TRINITY from his first chapter on GOD (pp. 21-23) and incite the intolerance of every A-THEIST who hides the leaven of everythingology in his/her preaching and the bread of the church’s communion.
Roger@talkofJESUS.com
For this they wilfully forget, that there were heavens from of old, and an earth compacted out of water and amidst water, by the word of God; by which means the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:
but the heavens that now are, and the earth, by the same word have been stored up for fire, being reserved against the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men.
Second Letter of the Apostle Peter to the Church 3:5-7 ASV
Think now of YOUR answers about GOD & Christ.
CHAPTERS
The Being and Character of God. [A-theology will NOT consider a premise of Almighty God. – RH]
Man [yet an a-theology reasoned in the mirror of humankind’s Darwinist mind may not have evolved to truth. – RH]
The Way of Salvation – John 3:16 ‘This is the language of the Son of God, and is a wonderfully compact statement of the way of salvation from the mighty and gracious Saviour himself. – Charles Boothe
The Son: His Coming and His Work
Gifts Flowing from the Grace of God
How Christians Should Live and Labor [*Everythingologists MUST help christians reconstruct this away from Biblical Truth. – RH]
The Bible [THE BIBLE CANNOT be god’s word if there is NO GOD. – Teaching of the a-theologist. – RH]
The Christian Church [As soon as an everythingologist can convince a christian to accept ALL religions, the church can then be reconstructed into a morally inclusive body which evolves with humankind.
“IN THE BEGINNING there was a wordless primate. – Darwinist evolution of the Church of Humankind. – RH]
The Last Things [Humans will be the demise of the world we destroy. – Ecology of Humanistic Religiosity RH]
A Brief Commentary on Plain Theology
Again, please note that the Contents listed above are those of Charles Octavius Boothe; however the commentaries are all mine and intended to provoke your commentsto ANY section of this post on Theology - the STUDY OF GOD. -
I cannot cover most of the implications of bad theology, false teaching and deceptive doctrine in this brief glance at theology; however as an introduction to WHY I have selected some of these terms to describe various philosophies, we will glance at dangers of a few known philosophies leavening the evangelism of the 21st century church.
The Dangers of Atheology
IF god is dead in the evolved minds of humankind,
THEN PhD’s of Everythingology can create culture to worship whatever we want and invent iconic heroes idolizing who we want to become.
IF JESUS is NOT God,
THEN Jesus was just an ordinary man and Christology just another philosophy.
IF the HOLY SPIRIT has never shown God’s power,
THEN god remains impotent to act in a cosmos or specifically in humankind.
DOCTRINE – What do you believe? Can you affirm it to others?
But IF the BIBLE is Truly God’s Word,
Only Scripture Becomes a Valid Premise
Returning now to "PLAIN THEOLOGY FOR PLAIN PEOPLE," Chapter 4, The Son: His Coming and His Work, consider the simple yet powerful theology of the word of Jesus Christ as given to the ages in Scripture.
(7) THE RESURRECTION OF CHRIST
It is interesting to notice what stress is laid in the New Testament on the resurrection of Christ. The sacred writers were deeply impressed with the importance of testifying to those to whom they preacher the gospel, that, after his death on the cross and his burial in the new tomb of Joseph of Arimathea, Jesus rose from the dead, and to present to them clear proofs of the wonderful fact.
Charles Octavius Boothe, PLAIN THEOLOGY FOR PLAIN PEOPLE, p.51
Boothe continues his Christology, supported by Scripture, noting:
‘It was true that Jesus again and again had foretold his rising from the dead..’
Boothe then guides us to the Scripture which immediately came to mind for me.
For I handed down to you as of first importance what I also received, that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, and that He was buried, and that He was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures, and that He appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve. After that He appeared to more than five hundred brothers and sisters at one time, most of whom remain until now..
First Letter of the Apostle Paul to the Church at Corinth 15:3-6a NASB20
Now if Christ is proclaimed as raised from the dead, how can some of you say that there is no resurrection of the dead?
Question of the Apostle Paul to Christians at Corinth – 1 Cor 15:12 ESV
What a great QUESTION to some believers doubting Christ due to false philosophy questioning their faith. But the learned theological teacher Paul has an even better reasoning to question their questioning:
But if there is no resurrection of the dead,
then not even Christ has been raised.
And if Christ has not been raised,
then our preaching is in vain and your faith is in vain.
Then the negative argument and presumed logic of the A-theologists of Corinth:
We are even found to be misrepresenting God, because we testified about God that he raised Christ, whom he did not raise if it is true that the dead are not raised.
THAT is WHAT the A-theologist and Everythingologists would like to convince Christian to think.
HOWEVER; The Apostle Paul provides our better answer in the truth of this Scripture:
But the fact is, Christ has been raised from the dead, the first fruits of those who are asleep.
For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ all will be made alive. But each in his own order: Christ the first fruits, after that those who are Christ’s at His coming, then comes the end..
I Corinthians 15:20, 22-24a NASB20
Christology is all-inclusive of a fearful Truth for A-theologists: death and then the Judgment!
NEXT Saturday Post, God-willing:
The Divisive Philosophies of Evangelical Christians